Nitrogen (N) is one of the most widely distributed elements in nature and is present virtually everywhere on the earth’s crust in one or more of its many chemical forms. Nitrate (NO3), a mobile form of N, is commonly found in ground and surface waters throughout the country. Nitrate is generally the dominant form of N where total N levels are elevated. Nitrate and other forms of N in water can be from natural sources, but when N concentrations are elevated, the sources are typically associated with human activities (Dubrovski et al., 2010). Concerns about nitrate and total N in Minnesota’s water resources have been increasing due to effects of nitrate on certain aquatic life and drinking water supplies, along with increasing N in the Mississippi River and its impact on Gulf of Mexico oxygen depletion.

Where does nitrate come from?

	Source: Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters (2013)
How does nitrate move from cropland into our water?
                                                           Source: Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters (2013) | 
			
				 Tile drainage pathway  | 
		
Where does the nitrate go?
Nitrate loads leaving Minnesota via the Mississippi River contribute to the oxygen-depleted “dead zone” in the Gulf of Mexico (currently estimated to be the size of Massachusetts). The dead zone cannot support aquatic life, affecting commercial and recreational fishing and the overall health of the Gulf.
How do we reduce the nitrate going into surface waters?
Tactics for reducing cropland nitrate going into surface waters fall into three categories:
Nitrate fertilizer efficiency has improved during the past two decades. While further refinements in fertilizer rates and application timing can be expected to reduce nitrate loads by roughly 13% statewide, additional and more costly practices will also be needed to make further reductions and meet downstream needs. Statewide reductions of more than 30% are not realistic with current practices.
To see progress, nitrate leaching reductions are needed across large parts of southern Minnesota, particularly on tile-drained fields and row crops over thin or sandy soils. Only collective incremental changes by many over broad acreages will result in significant nitrogen reductions to downstream waters.
	 
Nitrogen is considered a limiting nutrient in the Gulf of Mexico, the body of water where much of Minnesota’s river and stream waters ultimately discharge. When nutrients in the Mississippi River originating in 31 states reach the Gulf of Mexico, a low oxygen “dead zone” known as hypoxia develops.
Hypoxia, which means low oxygen, occurs when excess nutrients, primarily N and P, stimulate algal growth in the Mississippi River and gulf waters. The algae and associated zooplankton grow well beyond the natural capacity of predators or consumers to maintain the plankton at a more balanced level. As the short-lived plankton die and sink to deeper waters, bacteria decompose the phytoplankton carbon, consuming considerable oxygen in the process. Water oxygen levels plummet, forcing mobile creatures like fish, shrimp, and crab to move out of the area. Less mobile aquatic life become stressed and/or dies.
	
	The freshwater Mississippi River is less dense and warmer compared to the more dense cooler saline waters of the gulf. This results in a stratification of the incoming river waters and the existing gulf waters, preventing the mixing of the oxygen-rich surface water with oxygen-poor water on the bottom.  Without mixing, oxygen in the bottom water is limited and the hypoxic zone remains. Hypoxia can persist for several months until there is strong mixing of the ocean waters, which can come from a hurricane or cold fronts in the fall and winter.
Hypoxic waters have dissolved oxygen concentrations of less than about 2-3 mg/l. Fish and shrimp species normally present on the ocean floor are not found when dissolved oxygen levels reduce to less than 2 mg/l. The Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone is the largest in the United States and the second largest in the world. The maximum areal extent of this hypoxic zone was measured at 8,500 square miles during the summer of 2002. The average size of the hypoxic zone in the northern Gulf of Mexico in recent years (between 2004 and 2008) has been about 6,500 square miles, the size of Lake Ontario.
	
	Hypoxia Task Force
	A multi-state Hypoxia Task Force (which includes Minnesota) released their first Action Plan in 2001. This plan was reaffirmed and updated in a 2008 Action Plan. The Hypoxia Task Force established a collaborative interim goal to reduce the 5-year running average areal extent of the Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone to less than 5,000 square kilometers (1,931 square miles). Further information about Gulf of Mexico hypoxia can be found at: https://gulfhypoxia.net/
A thorough technical discussion of the research associated with Gulf of Mexico hypoxia and possible nutrient reduction options is presented by the US EPA (2007). The report notes that P may be more influential than N in the near-shore gulf water algae growth, particularly in the spring months, when algae and phytoplankton growth are often greatest. In the transition months between spring and summer, the algae and phytoplankton growth are controlled largely by the coupling of P and N. Nitrogen typically becomes the controlling nutrient in the summer and fall months. Based on these more recent findings, emphasis has shifted to developing strategies for dual nutrient removal (P and N). The Science Advisory Board recommends a 45% reduction in riverine TP and TN loads into the Gulf of Mexico (US EPA 2007).
	
	Minnesota’s Contribution to Gulf Hypoxia
	Certain areas of Minnesota release large quantities of N and P to Minnesota streams. Much of the nutrients remain in the Mississippi River system, ultimately reaching the Gulf of Mexico. Alexander et al. (2008) used computer modeling (SPARROW) to estimate the proportion of gulf nutrients originating in different geographic areas. The model accounted for the loss of nutrients in the river, river pools, and backwaters prior to reaching the Gulf of Mexico. This modeling indicated that Minnesota contributed 3% of Gulf of Mexico N and 2% of the P. However, with more recent SPARROW modeling, Minnesota’s contribution is estimated to be higher, ranking as the sixth highest state for N contributions behind Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Missouri. The more recent modeling estimates indicate that Minnesota is responsible for about 6% of the N loading and 4% of the P loading into the Gulf of Mexico (Robertson, 2012 personal communication).
	
	Recognizing that it will take a concerted effort by all states which contribute significant amounts of nutrients to the gulf, the MPCA agreed with other top nutrient contributing states to complete and implement a comprehensive N and P reduction strategy. This plan was completed in 2014 (Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force, 2008). The goal of the Action Plan is to reduce nutrients to the Gulf of Mexico while at the same time addressing in-state water protection and restoration.
	
	Minnesota Nitrogen Study
	The MPCA conducted a study of nitrogen in surface waters so that we can better understand the nitrogen conditions in Minnesota’s surface waters, along with the sources, pathways, trends and potential ways to reduce nitrogen in waters.
Excerpts from Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters
	
 Sources of Nitrogen - Results Overview
	
 Sources of Nitrogen - Wastewater Point Source Nitrogen Loads
	
 Sources of Nitrogen - Atmospheric Deposition of Nitrogen in Minnesota Watersheds
Statewide - N Sources to Waters - Average Year

	Source: Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters, Sources of Nitrogen - Results Overview (2013)
	
	Cropland  sources contribute an estimated 73 percent of the statewide N load during an average precipitation year. Cropland nitrogen is primarily delivered to surface waters through subsurface pathways of tile drainage and groundwater.
	 
Minnesota River Basin - N Sources to Surface Waters

	Source: Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters, Sources of Nitrogen - Results Overview, 2013
	
	 Statewide - N Sources to Surface Waters Chart -Average Year 

	Source: Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters, Sources of Nitrogen - Results Overview (2013)
	
	Estimated N loads to surface waters from different sources within the Minnesota portions of major basins during an average precipitation year. “Ag” represents cropland sources.

	
 Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network - MPCA
	
	Water Quality Databases
	
 DNR/MPCA Cooperative Stream Gaging Network – USGS, DNR, MPCA – Stream discharge and links to Division of Waters Resources, climate information, river levels, water quality information, recreation and commonly used hydrologic terms
	
 USGS – USGS discharge Information
	
 EDA Environmental Data Access – Water quality data collected for all MPCA monitoring projects
	
 EQuIS – Environmental Quality Information System – Water quality data from more than 17,000 sampling locations across the state.
![]()  | 
		
Source: Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network - MPCA (2014)
	
	Average annual flow-weighted mean concentrations for Total Nitrogen near watershed outlets based on annual averages derived from available information collected in 2007-11.
![]()  | 
			
				 
  | 
		
Source: Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network - MPCA (2014)
	
	Average annual yield (lbs/acre) for Total Nitrogen near watershed outlets based on annual averages derived from available information collected in 2007-11.
![]()  | 
			
				 
  | 
		
Source: Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network - MPCA (2014)
	
	Average annual Total Nitrogen Load near watershed outlets based on annual averages derived from available information collected in 2007-11.
Excerpts from 
 Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters - MPCA
	
 Chapter 4: Modeled Nitrogen Loads (SPARROW)
The MPCA’s Nitrogen Study shows elevated nitrate levels, particularly in the southern third of Minnesota.
![]()  | 
			![]()  | 
		
Source: Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters, Chapter 4: Modeled Nitrogen Loads (SPARROW) (2013)
	
	Data Source: SPARROW flow-weighted mean TN concentration by HUC8 watersheds.  The value represents the median FWMC of all subwatershed catchments within the HUC8 watersheds.
	
	SPARROW Modeling for the Lower Minnesota Watershed indicated average flow-weighted mean TN concentration of 10.86 mg/l. This value represents the median FWMC of all subwatershed catchments within the Lower Minnesota Watershed.
![]()  | 
			![]()  | 
		
Source: Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters, Chapter 4: Modeled Nitrogen Loads (SPARROW) (2013)
	
	SPARROW model annual TN yield results by HUC8 watershed in lbs/acre/year.  The basin yields represent the total load delivered to the watershed outlet or state border divided by the sum of the SPARROW (MRB3 2002) catchment area.
	
	SPARROW model annual TN yield results for the Lower Minnesota Watershed was 15.93 lbs/acre/year.
	 
Statewide Comparison of Nitrate+Nitrate-N Yields (lbs/ac)
	
| 
				 
  | 
			
				 Nitrite+Nitrate-N   | 
		
| 
				 S. Central  | 
			
				 11-19  | 
		
| 
				 Southeast  | 
			
				 8-9  | 
		
| 
				 Southwest  | 
			
				 4-9  | 
		
| 
				 Central  | 
			
				 1-2  | 
		
| 
				 Northwest  | 
			
				 0.1-1  | 
		
| 
				 Northeast  | 
			
				 0.1-2  | 
		
Source: Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters (2013)
Total Nitrogen Contributions to the Mississippi River (percent Load by HUC8 Watershed)
Source: Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters, 2013
	
	Percent contribution of TN delivered to the Mississippi River in Keokuk, Iowa, from each of Minnesota’s HUC8 Watersheds which ultimately drain into the Mississippi River. Each bar represents the percent TN originating from a single watershed, from highest contributor (left) to lowest contributor (right).
	 
Fifteen of the 45 watersheds draining into the Mississippi River from Minnesota each contribute over 3 percent of the modeled load delivered to the Mississippi River in southern Iowa (Keokuk) (Table 4 and Figure 9). Combined, these 15 watersheds contribute 73.7 percent of the total nitrogen load delivered to Keokuk from Minnesota (Figure 10). These higher loading watersheds are mostly located in South-central and southeastern Minnesota. The other thirty watersheds each contribute between 0 and 2.4 percent of the load, and are thus considered relatively minor contributors.
	
| 
				 WS #  | 
			
				 Watershed Name  | 
			
				 % load contribution  | 
		
| 
				 33  | 
			
				 Lower Minnesota River  | 
			
				 7.3  | 
		
| 
				 28  | 
			
				 Minnesota River - Mankato  | 
			
				 6.7  | 
		
| 
				 30  | 
			
				 Blue Earth River  | 
			
				 6.4  | 
		
| 
				 32  | 
			
				 Le Sueur River  | 
			
				 5.7  | 
		
| 
				 25  | 
			
				 Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River  | 
			
				 5.6  | 
		
| 
				 39  | 
			
				 Cannon River  | 
			
				 5.2  | 
		
| 
				 43  | 
			
				 Root River  | 
			
				 5.2  | 
		
| 
				 41  | 
			
				 Zumbro River  | 
			
				 4.9  | 
		
| 
				 19  | 
			
				 South Fork Crow River  | 
			
				 4.7  | 
		
| 
				 48  | 
			
				 Cedar River  | 
			
				 4.4  | 
		
| 
				 29  | 
			
				 Cottonwood River  | 
			
				 4.3  | 
		
| 
				 20  | 
			
				 Mississippi River - Twin Cities  | 
			
				 3.7  | 
		
| 
				 31  | 
			
				 Watonwan River  | 
			
				 3.4  | 
		
| 
				 51  | 
			
				 Des Moines River - Headwaters  | 
			
				 3.2  | 
		
| 
				 26  | 
			
				 Chippewa River  | 
			
				 3.1  | 
		
| 
				 18  | 
			
				 North Fork Crow River  | 
			
				 2.4  | 
		
| 
				 16  | 
			
				 Sauk River  | 
			
				 1.7  | 
		
| 
				 27  | 
			
				 Redwood River  | 
			
				 1.6  | 
		
| 
				 40  | 
			
				 Mississippi River - Winona  | 
			
				 1.5  | 
		
| 
				 15  | 
			
				 Mississippi River - Sartell  | 
			
				 1.4  | 
		
| 
				 38  | 
			
				 Mississippi River - Lake Pepin  | 
			
				 1.4  | 
		
| 
				 17  | 
			
				 Mississippi River - St. Cloud  | 
			
				 1.4  | 
		
| 
				 21  | 
			
				 Rum River  | 
			
				 1.3  | 
		
| 
				 49  | 
			
				 Shell Rock River  | 
			
				 1.3  | 
		
| 
				 10  | 
			
				 Mississippi River - Brainerd  | 
			
				 1.2  | 
		
| 
				 37  | 
			
				 Lower St. Croix River  | 
			
				 1.1  | 
		
| 
				 24  | 
			
				 Lac Qui Parle River  | 
			
				 1.1  | 
		
| 
				 23  | 
			
				 Pomme de Terre River  | 
			
				 1.0  | 
		
| 
				 50  | 
			
				 Winnebago River  | 
			
				 0.8  | 
		
| 
				 36  | 
			
				 Snake River  | 
			
				 0.8  | 
		
| 
				 9  | 
			
				 Mississippi River - Grand Rapids  | 
			
				 0.7  | 
		
| 
				 12  | 
			
				 Crow Wing River  | 
			
				 0.7  | 
		
| 
				 46  | 
			
				 Upper Iowa River  | 
			
				 0.6  | 
		
| 
				 13  | 
			
				 Redeye River  | 
			
				 0.6  | 
		
| 
				 35  | 
			
				 Kettle River  | 
			
				 0.6  | 
		
| 
				 14  | 
			
				 Long Prairie River  | 
			
				 0.6  | 
		
| 
				 53  | 
			
				 East Fork Des Moines River  | 
			
				 0.5  | 
		
| 
				 22  | 
			
				 Minnesota River - Headwaters  | 
			
				 0.4  | 
		
| 
				 44  | 
			
				 Mississippi River - Reno  | 
			
				 0.4  | 
		
| 
				 42  | 
			
				 Mississippi River - La Crescent  | 
			
				 0.4  | 
		
| 
				 34  | 
			
				 Upper St. Croix River  | 
			
				 0.3  | 
		
| 
				 52  | 
			
				 Lower Des Moines River  | 
			
				 0.2  | 
		
| 
				 7  | 
			
				 Mississippi River - Headwaters  | 
			
				 0.1  | 
		
| 
				 11  | 
			
				 Pine River  | 
			
				 0.1  | 
		
| 
				 8  | 
			
				 Leech Lake River  | 
			
				 0.0  | 
		
| 
				 47  | 
			
				 Upper Wapsipinicon River  | 
			
				 0.0  | 
		
Source: Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters, 2013
Excerpts from 
 Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters
	
 Nitrate Trends in Minnesota Rivers
	
 Nitrogen Trend Results from Previous Studies
	 
Four tributaries to the Minnesota River upstream of Courtland had trend analyses performed. All four rivers showed no significant trends since 1993 (Table 8). Prior to 1993, nitrate was increasing in the Pomme de Terre and Redwood Rivers and was stable (no significant trend) at the more influential Yellow Medicine and Cottonwood Rivers.
The Greater Blue Earth River contributes substantial quantities of nitrate to the Minnesota River and therefore has a large effect on Minnesota River nitrate levels in these areas. The Blue Earth River showed an increase from 1976 to 1982, followed by a long gradual decrease. Conversely, the Watonwan River has shown a long gradual increase in flow-adjusted nitrate concentrations. Neither of these trends in the Blue Earth and Watonwan mirror the trends in the downstream segments of the Minnesota River, and therefore additional tributaries and factors appear to be at work affecting nitrate trends in the Minnesota River Basin.
	
	Source: Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters, Nitrate Trends in the Minnesota River Basin (2013)
	
	
	
	 
Phosphorus is the nutrient primarily responsible for the eutrophication (nutrient enrichment of waterbodies) of Minnesota’s surface waters. Phosphorus is an essential nutrient for plants, animals and humans. It is one of the 20 most abundant elements in the solar system, and the 11th most abundant in the earth’s crust. Under natural conditions phosphorus (P) is typically scarce in water. Human activities, however, have resulted in excessive loading of phosphorus into many freshwater systems. This can cause water pollution by promoting excessive algae growth, particularly in lakes. Lakes that appear relatively clear in spring can resemble green soup in late summer due to algae blooms fueled by phosphorus. Water quality can be further impaired when bacteria consume dead algae and use up dissolved oxygen,suffocating fish and other aquatic life.
An overabundance of phosphorus—specifically usable (bioavailable) phosphorus—results in excessive algal production in Minnesota waters. Phosphorus from point sources may be more bioavailable, impacting surface water quality more than a similar amount of nonpoint source phosphorus that enters the same surface water conditions. Total phosphorus levels of 100 or more ppb categorize lakes as highly eutrophic, with high nutrient and algae levels.
	
	In some water bodies, the concentration of phosphorus is low enough to limit the growth of algae and/or aquatic plants. In this case, scientists say phosphorus is the limiting nutrient. For example, in water bodies having total phosphorus concentrations less than 10 parts per billion (1 ppb – equal to one drop in a railroad tank car), waters will be nutrient-poor and will not support large quantities of algae and aquatic plants.
	
	
	MPCA
Phosphorus contributions to Minnesota surface waters by point and nonpoint sources are known to vary, both geographically and over time, in response to annual variations in weather and climate. Nonpoint sources of phosphorus tend to comprise a larger fraction of the aggregate phosphorus load to Minnesota surface waters during relatively wet periods, while point sources become increasingly important during dry periods.
	
	Minnesota River Basin-Lake Pepin
	Three major river basins empty into Lake Pepin in southeastern Minnesota – St. Croix, Upper Mississippi, and the Minnesota. Lake Pepin is listed as an impaired water due to sediment and eutrophication (excessive nutrients and algae). The Minnesota River contributes a majority of the sediment. In a highly turbid water body such as the Minnesota River, much of the phosphorus load is attached to eroded soil particles, especially at higher flows. Much of the particulate phosphorus in the Minnesota River converts to the soluble that can become available to algae. This occurs in several ways: chemical and physical change (diagenesis) of sediment in the river or lake bed, interaction with dissolved chemicals in the water, and decay of organic P releasing dissolved phosphorus from soil particles. Models being used in the Lake Pepin and Minnesota River Total Maximum Daily Load projects keep track of both particulate and dissolved forms of phosphorus.
	
	The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is currently developing new water quality standards for River Eutrophication and Total Suspended Solids. Visit the MPCA website for more information.
	
	Sources:
	
 Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy - MPCA
	
 Phosphorus: Sources, Forms, Impacts on Water Quality - MPCA
	
 New Water Quality Standards for River Eutrophication and Total Suspended Solids - MPCA
	
	
	 
Excerpts From Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy,  
 Chapter 5 Point and Nonpoint Source Reductions (2013)
	
Detailed Assessment of Phosphorus Sources to Minnesota Watersheds (2004)
	
 Summary of Phosphorus Loading by Basin (2004)
	
	Statewide Phosphorus Sources, Average Year

	Source: Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy, Chapter 5 Point and Nonpoint Source Reductions (2013)
	 
Under normal water flows, roughly two- thirds of the total phosphorus load to lakes and rivers comes from nonpoint sources such as runoff from pasture and croplands, atmospheric deposition and stream bank erosion. Phosphorus loading contributed by runoff from pastures and croplands is largest source of nonpoint phosphorus on a statewide basis. Other nonpoint sources include urban runoff, non-agricultural rural runoff and seepage from individual sewage treatment systems.
Approximately 30 percent of the phosphorus load to Minnesota waters comes from point sources such as municipal and industrial wastewater treatment facilities. The magnitude of various sources of phosphorus varies greatly throughout the state due to the diverse nature of Minnesota’s watersheds.
	 
Mississippi River
	Phosphorus Sources to Surface Waters
	Current: Average Precipitation Year
	
Source: Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy (2013)
Pollutant Load Monitoring Sites in Minnesota
	
	
 Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network - MPCA
	
	Water Quality Databases
	
 DNR/MPCA Cooperative Stream Gaging Network – USGS, DNR, MPCA – Stream discharge and links to Division of Waters Resources, climate information, river levels, water quality information, recreation and commonly used hydrologic terms
	
 USGS – USGS discharge Information
	
 EDA Environmental Data Access – Water quality data collected for all MPCA monitoring projects
	
 EQuIS – Environmental Quality Information System – Water quality data from more than 17,000 sampling locations across the state.
![]()  | 
		
Source: Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network - MPCA (2014)
	
	Average annual flow-weighted mean concentrations (mg/L) for Total Phosphorus near watershed outlets based on yearly averages derived from available information collected in 2007-011.
	
	
	 
![]()  | 
			
				 
  | 
		
Source: Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network - MPCA (2014)
	
	Average annual Total Phosphorus Yield (lbs/acre) near watershed outlets based on yearly averages derived from available information collected in 2007-011.
![]()  | 
		
Source: Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network - MPCA (2014)
	
	Average annual Total Phosphorus Load (kg) near watershed outlets based on yearly averages derived from available information collected in 2007-011.
	 
SPARROW modeling
	The SPAtially Referenced Regressions on Watershed attributes (SPARROW) model, developed and maintained by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), was used for the Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy to estimate Total Phosphorus (TP) loads, yields, and flow-weighted mean concentrations (FWMC) in Minnesota 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC8) watersheds and major basins.
	
	Modeling Total Phosphorus Yield (lb/ac/yr)
![]()  | 
			![]()  | 
		
Source: Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy (2013)
Statewide 
	Implementation of MPCA’s Phosphorus Strategy and Minnesota Rule Chapter 7053.0255 has resulted in significant wastewater effluent phosphorus load reductions since the year 2000.
Statewide Wastewater Phosphorus Effluent Loading
	
	Source: Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy, Chapter 5: Point and Nonpoint Source Reductions
	
	Municipal and Industrial Wastewater Phosphorus Trends & Projections
	
	Source: Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy, Chapter 4: Management Priorites and Recent Progress
	
	Mississippi River Basin
	Summary of Recent Progress in Phosphorus Source Loads by Major Basin
	Efforts between 2000 and present have resulted in significant progress in reducing phosphorus loads in the Mississippi River Basin, due to both agricultural BMPs and wastewater treatment plant upgrades.
	
Source: Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy, Chapter 4: Management Priorites and Recent Progress
	Notes: Recent progress is the percent of baseline load remaining after accounting for reductions since 2000.
	
	
	Source: Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy, Appendix A
Assessed Lakes (2012) in the Lower Minnesota River Watershed
Impairment Parameters:
	Nutrients = Nutrients
	HgF = Mercury in Fish Tissue
	HgW = Mercury in Water Column
	CL = Chloride
	PCBF = PCBs in Fish
	PFOS = Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) in Fish Tissue
	 
Affected Uses:
	AQC = Aquatic Consumption
	AQR = Aquatic Recreation
	AQL = Aquatic Life
	 
Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Assessed Waters (2012) & Impaired Waters (2012)
Statewide Impaired Lakesheds
	
	Source: Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy, Chapter 2 Setting Goals and Milestones (2013)
	
	For more information about what you can do to protect area lakes, visit MPCA's Lake protection and management website.
 Watershed Contacts - MPCA 
	
 Local Government Directories and Maps - BWSR
	
	
	Watershed Contacts
Water Resources Center
		Minnesota State University, Mankato
		184 Trafton Science Center S
		Mankato, MN 56001
		507-389-5492
		
 Minnesota River Basin Data Center
		
 MSUM-WRC
		
		Sibley County
		
 Sibley County Environmental Services
		
 Sibley County SWCD
Carver County
		
 Carver County Environmental Services
		
 Carver County SWCD
Dakota County
		
 Dakota County SWCD
		
 Dakota County-Home 
		
		Hennepin County
		
 Hennepin County SWCD
		
 Hennepin County Environment
Le Sueur County
		
 Le Sueur County-Environmental Services 
		
 Le Sueur County SWCD
McLeod County
		
 McLeod County-Environmental Services
		
 McLeod County SWCD
Nicollet County
		
 Nicollet County-Environmental Services 
		
 Nicollet County SWCD 
Renville County
		
 Renville County-Home 
		
 Renville County SWCD
Ramsey County
		
 Ramsey County-Public Health
		
 Ramsey County SWCD
Rice County
		
 Rice County-Water Resource Management
		
 Rice County SWCD
Scott County
		
 Scott County-Environmental Health 
		
 Scott County-SWCD 
		 
 The Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy - MPCA
	
	Driving forces and building blocks for the Nutrient Reduction Strategy
	
 Hypoxia Action Plan
	
 Clean Water Land & Legacy Amendment
	
 Minnesota Watershed Approach
	
 Groundwater Proection and Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan
	
 Minnesota Water Sustainability Framework
	
 Detailed Assessment of Phosphorus Sources to Minnesota Watersheds
	
 Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters
	
 Modeled Nitrogen Loads (SPARROW)
	
 Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring - MPCA
	Long Term Water Quality Monitoring - 
 USGS, 
 Met Council, 
 Manitoba
Minnesota River Basin
	
 Minnesota River Basin Water Quality Overview
	
 Minnesota River Basin: General Phosphorus Permit – Phase 1
	
 Phosphorus in surface waters: the Minnesota River case study (1998)
	
 Snowmelt runoff, sediment, and phosphorus losses under three different tillage systems (2000)
	
 Targeting nonpoint source pollution control: phosphorus in the Minnesota River Basin (2002)
	
 Pollution trading to offset new pollutant loadings – a case study in the Minnesota River Basin (2003)
	
 Minnesota River Basin Reconnaissance Study (2004)
	
 Minnesota River Watershed Model and TMDL (2004)
	
 Point-Nonpoint source water quality trading: A case study in the Minnesota River Basin (2005)
	
 Influence of alternative and conventional farming practices on subsurface drainage and water quality (2007)
	
 Phosphorus dynamics and loading in the turbid Minnesota River (USA): Controls and recycling potential (2008)
	
 Sediment equilibrium and diffusive fluxes in relation to phosphorus dynamics in the turbid Minnesota River (2009)
	
 HSPF Sediment Research: Minnesota River (2012-2013)
Metro-region
	
 Estimating nonpoint source pollution for the Twin Cities metropolitan area using landscape variables (2006)
	
 Metro Wide Subwatershed Stormwater Retrofit Analysis (2012-2014)
	
 Stormwater Reuse Guide Outreach (2013)
Lower Minnesota River Watershed
	
 Watershed Restoration and Protection (MPCA)
	
 Lower Minnesota River Major Watershed WRAP Strategy (MPCA)
	
 Lower Minnesota Major Watershed Projects (MPCA)
	
 Lower Minnesota River TMDL Project – Low Dissolved Oxygen (MPCA)
	
 Rapid Watershed Assessment: Lower Minnesota River
	
 Nitrate Nitrogen in surface waters as influenced by climatic conditions and agricultural practices (2001)
	
 Survey of 28 Farms in the Bevens Creek Watershed and Sand Creek Watershed (2002)
	
 Modeling sediment and phosphorus losses in an agricultural watershed to meet TMDLs (2004)
	
 Tillage and nutrient source effects on water quality and corn grain yield from a flat landscape (2005)
	
 Model based nitrate TMDLs for two agricultural watersheds of southeastern Minnesota (2007)
	
 Lower Minnesota River Study: Monitoring and modeling water quality from Jordan, Minnesota, to the mouth (2010)
	
 Nitrogen use and determinants of best management practices: A study of Rush River and Elm Creek agricultural producers (2012)
Black Dog Watershed Management Organization
	
 WMO Reports
	
 Crystal, Keller, and Lee Lakes TMDL and Earley Lake Water Quality Assessment Project – Excess Nutrients (MPCA)
	
 Crystal and Keller Lakes Use Attainability Analysis Diagnostic-Feasibility Study: Water Quality Issues and Potential Restorative Measures (2001-2003)
Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization
	
 WMO Projects and Reports
	
 Fish Lake TMDL and Schwanz Lake TMDL Nutrient Management Plan Project – Excess Nutrients (MPCA)
	
 Schwanz Lake Direct-Drainage Runoff-Reduction Project (2010-2011)
High Island Watershed District
	High Island Watershed Projects
	High Island Creek Watershed 2004 Work Plan
	High Island Creek Watershed Implementation Project
Lower Minnesota River Watershed District
	
 District Watershed Projects
	
 District Watershed Reports
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
	
 Cost Share Grant Program
	
 District Annual Reports
	
 Lake and Creek Reports
	
 Southeast Anderson Water Quality Improvement Project (2009)
	
 Nine Mile Creek Stabilization and Habitat Restoration (2010-2011)
Prior Lake Spring Lake Watershed
	
 District Projects
	
 Spring Lake Alum Treatment
	
 Spring Lake – Upper Prior Lake TMDL Project – Excess Nutrients (MPCA)
	
 Spring Lake – Upper Prior Lake Nutrient TMDL (2011)
	
 Sand Creek & Prior Lake Spring Lake Wetland Restoration Project (2011-2012)
	
 Upper Prior Lake – Targeted Retrofits & Enhancements (2011-2012)
	
 Upper Watershed Volume Reduction (2011-2012)
	
 Spring and Upper Prior Lake TMDL Implementation Plan (2012)
Richfield-Bloomington Watershed Management Organization
	
 WMO Management Plan
	
 WMO Projects
Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed
	
 District Projects
	
 Annual Reports
	
 Restoring our Waters though out Community (2013-2015)
Rush River Watershed District
	Projects: Feedlot Runoff Controls
	Rush River Implementation Project
	Rush River Watershed Publications
	Rush River Assessment Project Workplan (2002)
Carver County
	
 County Environmental Services
	
 SWCD Programs & Services
	
 SWCD Reports & Plans
	
 WMO Projects & Reports
	
 WMO Water Quality
	
 Burandt Lake TMDL Project – Excess Nutrients (MPCA)
	
 Carver Creek Lakes TMDL Project – Excess Nutrients (MPCA)
	
 Reitz Lake TMDL Project – Excess Nutrients (MPCA)
	
 Carver Creek Lakes TMDL Implementation Plan (2010)
	
 Reitz Lake TMDL Implementation Plan (2010)
	
 South Fork Crow River Lakes TMDL Implementation Plan (2010)
	
 Carver County Drainage Ditch 4A Sediment Pond (2010-2011)
	Riparian Buffer Easement Program - 
 Phase I (2010-2011) 
 Phase II (2012-2013)
	
 SSTS Imminent Health Threat Abatement Grant Program (2010-2011)
	
 SSTS Program Enhancement Grant Program (2010-2011)
	
 Carver County WMO Comprehensive Water Management Plan 2010-2020
	
 Carver County Fecal Coliform Implementation IV (2011-2012)
	
 Reitz Lake Restoration (2011-2012)
	
 Reducing Nutrients to Hydes Lake (2012-2014)
	
 Birdies Lane East Ravine Improvements, City of Chaska (2013-2015)
Le Sueur County
	
 County Feedlot Program
	
 County Water Management Program
	
 SWCD Services
	
 SWCD Reports
	
 Application of HSPF-AGCHEM Module within the WMS for the LeSueur Basin (2001)
	
 SSTS Program Enhancement Grant Program (2011-2013)
	Riparian Buffer Easement Program - 
 Phase II (2012-2013)
	
 Gorman Lake Water Retention Basins (2012-2014)
	
 Southern Minnesota Lakes Restoration (2013-2016)
	Shallow Lake & Wetland Protection Program - 
 Phase III (2013-2017)
	
 Accelerated Wetland and Shallow Lake Enhancement (2013-2018)
McLeod County
	
 SWCD Programs
	
 SWCD Projects
	
 SWCD Reports
	
 Feedlots
	RIM Wetlands Reserve Program Acquisition and Restoration - 
 Phase II (2010) 
 Phase III (2011)
	Riparian Buffer Easement Program - 
 Phase I (2010-2011) 
 Phase II (2012-2013)
	SSTS Imminent Health Threat Abatement Grant Program - 
 2010-2011 
 2011-2012 
 2012-2014 
 2013-2015
	Shallow Lake & Wetland Protection Program - 
 Phase III (2013-2017)
Nicollet County
	
 SWCD Programs & Services
	
 SWCD Annual Plan
	
 Feedlots
	
 Paired Watershed Studies for Nutrient Reductions in the Minnesota River Basin
	
 Using Conservation Drainage to Reduce Ravine Sedimentation in Seven Mile (2012-2013)
	Shallow Lake & Wetland Protection Program - 
 Phase III (2013-2017)
	
 Accelerated Wetland and Shallow Lake Enhancement (2013-2018)
Renville County
	
 SWCD Plans & Reports
	
 SWCD Services & Programs
	
 Feedlot Reports
	
 USGS Assessment of Conservation Easements, Total Phosphorus, and Total Suspended Solids in West Fork Beaver Creek, Minnesota (1999-2012)
	Riparian Buffer Easement Program - 
 Phase I (2010-2011) 
 Phase II (2012-2013)
	Feedlot Water Quality Management Program - 
 2012-2014 
 2013-2015
	
 Middle Minnesota River Watershed LiDAR BMP Inventory (2012-2014)
	
 Hawk Creek Watershed Runoff and Sedimentation Reduction (2013-2015)
	Shallow Lake & Wetland Protection Program - 
 Phase III (2013-2017)
Rice County
	
 SWCD Reports
	
 SWCD Programs
	
 Feedlot & Ag
	
 Phosphorus Source Assessment of the Roberds Lake Watershed (2007)
	
 Buffer Strips in the Cannon River Watershed (2010-2011)
	
 Feedlot Water Quality Management Grant Program (2010-2011)
	Riparian Buffer Easement Program - 
 Phase I (2010-2011) 
 Phase II (2012-2013)
	
 Data Report and Management Plan for Circle Lake, Rice County, Minnesota (2011)
	
 Nitrate-Nitrogen Probability Map (2011)
	
 Rice County Seepage Pit Research Summary (2011)
	SSTS Imminent Health Threat Abatement Grant Program - 
 2010-2011 
 2011-2012
	SSTS Program Enhancement Grant Program - 
 2010-2011 
 2011-2013
	
 Nutrient Management Along the Lower Mississippi River (2011-2012)
	
 Rice County Community Environmental Partnership Program (2012-2014)
	
 Southeast Minnesota Wastewater Initiative (2012-2014)
	
 Ensuring Stewardship: Rice County Community Environmental Partnership (2013-2015)
	
 Targeted Well Sealing in Rice County (2013-2015)
	Shallow Lake & Wetland Protection Program - 
 Phase III (2013-2017)
Scott County
	
 County Feedlot Program
	
 SWCD Reports
	
 WMO Programs & Projects
	
 WMO Reports & Documents
	
 Native Grasses and Filter Strips for Runoff and Pollution Reduction (2013-2015)
	
 Cedar Lake and McMahon Lake TMDL – Excess Nutrients (MPCA)
	
 Restoring Upper Porter and Picha Creeks (2010-2011)
	Riparian Buffer Easement Program - 
 Phase I (2010-2011)
	
 Runoff Reduction Using Native Grasses (2012-2014)
	
 Utica Ravine Stabilization (2010-2011)
	
 Cedar Lake Shoreline Improvements (2011-2012)
	
 Sand Creek & Prior Lake Spring Lake Wetland Restoration Project (2011-2012)
	
 SSTS Imminent Health Threat Abatement Grant Program (2011-2012)
	
 Cedar Lake and McMahon Lake Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan (2012)
	Riparian Buffer Easement Program - 
 Phase II (2012-2013)
	
 Using Native Grasses to Reduce Runoff – A Continuation (2012-2014)
	
 Cleary Lake Regional Park Water Quality Retrofits (2013-2015)
Sibley County
	
 SWCD Services
	
 SWCD Reports
	
 Feedlot Facts
	Shallow Lake & Wetland Protection Program - 
 Phase III (2013-2017)
Watershed Water Plan Summary
	
 Lower Minnesota River Watershed Water Plan Summary
Lower Minnesota River Watershed
	Percent of County in Watershed
	Water Plan Links
	
 Black Dog Watershed Management Plan 2012-2022
	
 Carver County Water Management Plan 2010-2020
	
 Gun Club Lake Watershed Managemetn Plan 2007
	
 Le Sueur County LWMP 2006-2015 amended 2011
	
 Lower Minnesota River Water Management Plan 2011-2020
	
 McLeod County LWMP 2013-2023
	
 Nicollet County LWMP 2008-2018
	
 Prior Lake-Spring Lake Water Resources Management Plan 2010-2019 amended 2013
	
 Nine Mile Creek Water Management Plan 2006
	
 Renville County LWMP 2013-2023
	
 Rice County LWMP 2004-2014 amended 2010
	
 Richfield-Bloomington Watershed Management Plan 2008
	
 Riley-Purgatory Bluff Creek Water Management Plan
	
 Scott County Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan 2009-2018
	
 Sibley County LWMP 2013-2023
Local Water Management Overview
	
 County Comprehensive Local Water Management - BWSR
	 
Minnesota Nutrient Strategy Overview
	
 Nitrogen Science
	
 Strategies for Nutrient Reduction - Wastewater
Planning Tools
 Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool - Nitrogen BMP Spreadsheet (Lazarus et al., 2013)
	Nitrogen Priority Watersheds & Reduction Milestone
	
 The Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy - MPCA
	Excerpts from 
 Chapter 4: Management Priorities and Recent Projects
	 
Nitrogen Priority Watersheds![]()  | 
			Reduction Milestone![]()  | 
		
Source: The Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy , Chapter 4: Management Priorities and Recent Projects (2013)
	
	Priority Sources
	Priority sources are determined on a basin scale, although it should be noted that different sources may be more or less important at the local scale. Priority sources at the HUC8 scale or smaller will be determined through watershed planning efforts at that scale.
	
	Source: The Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy , Chapter 4: Management Priorities and Recent Projects (2013)
	
	Example BMP Scenario for Nitrogen Reduction
	
 The Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy - MPCA
	Excerpts from 
 Chapter 5: Point and Nonpoint Source Reductions
	
	Source: The Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy , Chapter 4: Management Priorities and Recent Projects (2013)
	
	See "Economics" Tab for a summary of Le Sueur River Watershed BMP Nitrogen Reduction Scenario.
	
	 
Minnesota Nutrient Strategy Overview
	
 Phosphorus Science
	
 Strategies for Nutrient Reduction - Wastewater
	Phosphorus Priority Watersheds & Reduction Milestone
	
 The Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy - MPCA
	Excerpts from 
 Chapter 4: Management Priorities and Recent Projects
	 
Phosphorus Priority Watersheds![]()  | 
			![]()  | 
		
Source: The Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy (2013)
	
	Priority Sources
	Priority sources are determined on a basin scale, although it should be noted that different sources may be more or less important at the local scale. Priority sources at the HUC8 scale or smaller will be determined through watershed planning efforts at that scale.
	
	Source: The Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy , Chapter 4: Management Priorities and Recent Projects (2013)
	
	Agricultural BMPs
	Example BMP scenario for Phosphorus Reduction
	
 The Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy - MPCA 
	Excerpts from 
 Chapter 5: Point and Nonpoint Source Reductions

	Source: The Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy, Chapter 5: Point and Nonpoint Source Reductions (2013)
Watershed Summary
	
 Minnesota River Progress Report – MSU WRC
 Rapid Watershed Assessment Resource Profile: Lower Minnesota  - NRCS
 Lake Pepin Legacy Alliance - County Scorecard
	- Sibley
	- Carver
	- Dakota
	- Le Sueur
	- Steele
	- Renville
	- Rice
	- Scott
Conservation Practices
	
 Conservation Easements - BWSR
	
 Conservation Implementation - BWSR
	
 Interactive Conservation Easement Map RIM - BWSR
	
 Conservation Practices - MDA
BMP Summary
	Excerpts from 
 The Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy - MPCA
	
 Chapter 5 - Point and Nonpoint Source Reductions
	
 Appendix C - Agricultural BMPs
	
	Because agricultural sources contribute the bulk of the statewide nitrogen load and a substantial portion of the phosphorus load, nitrogen and phosphorus reductions from agricultural sources are key to successfully achieving the milestones. Recommended agricultural BMPs and strategy options for promoting adoption of the BMPs to address phosphorus and nitrogen are provided in the links above.
Phosphorus: Based on the SPARROW model and the source attributions developed in the Detailed Assessment of Phosphorus Sources to Minnesota Watersheds (Barr Engineering 2004), agricultural sources contribute an estimated 38 percent of the statewide phosphorus load. A large part of the remaining phosphorus load is due to stream channel erosion, much of which is indirectly affected by agricultural runoff and intensive drainage practices (Schottler et al. 2013).
	
	Nitrogen: Based on the Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters study (MPCA 2013), agriculture contributes 73 percent of the statewide nitrogen load in a typical year.
	See "Strategy - N Reduction" and "Strategy - P Reduction" Tabs for example BMP Scenarios for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Reduction
	
	 
 Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool - Nitrogen BMP Spreadsheet (Lazarus et al., 2013)
	
	
 Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy SPARROW  - (MPCA, 2013)
	
	
 Minnesota River Basin Turbidity Scenario Report - HSPF - (Tetra Tech, 2009)
	
	
 Lake Pepin Watershed Full Cost Accounting SWAT, InVEST, Sediment Rating Curve Regression, and Optimization (Dalzell et al., 2012)
	
	
 Modeling of Sediment, Nutrients and Pesticides in the Le Sueur River Watershed - SWAT (Folle, 2010)
	
	
 GSSHA Model – Agricultural Water Certification Program – GSSHA Model – (MDNR, In Progress)
 USDA-NRCS Nutrient Tracking Tool – Tarleton State (Texas Example)
NTT estimates the nutrient and sediment load leaving a farm field through surface water runoff and leaching below the rooting zone and can be used to quantify the water quality benefits of different agricultural management systems and conservation practices. Designed and developed by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS), and Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research at Tarleton State University (TiAER), NTT is intended for use by agricultural professionals or others familiar with farm procedures and conservation practices.
 Ag BMP Assessment and Tracking Tool – Houston Engineering
	Solutions for improving impaired waters often rely on the use of agricultural best management practices (BMPs). The goal of this project is to collect and disseminate thorough and accurate information on the use and effectiveness of agricultural BMPs in the State of Minnesota. Stakeholders can use this information to inform, mock-up and track their BMP implementation strategies.
	
	
 AG BMP Database - Houston Engineering
	The goal of the Ag BMP Database is to provide a comprehensive source of information on the application and effectiveness of agricultural BMPs within the State of Minnesota. The database was developed to hold information on BMPs that are commonly used in the State to address water quality impairments for: sediment, nitrogen, phosphorus, and bacteria.
	 
Ecological Ranking Tools
	
 Watershed Health Assessment Framework - MDNR  
	The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) provides a comprehensive overview of the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds.  By applying a consistent statewide approach, the WHAF expands our understanding of processes and interactions that create healthy and unhealthy responses in Minnesota's watersheds.   Health scores are used to provide a baseline for exploring patterns and relationships in emerging health trends.
	
	
 Ecological Ranking of Parcels for Prioritizing Conservation Activities – NRRI
	This site provides a mapping tool by which natural resource managers can visualize and interact with a high resolution map of the spatial data layers. Managers have the ability to specify the relative importance of habitat, soil erosion potential, or other components of the Environmental Benefits Index - a score which represents a summary of the above factors., and view how the ecological ranking of parcels changes under different scenarios.
	http://beaver.nrri.umn.edu/EcolRank/
FUNDING GUIDES
	
 Conservation Practices - Funding Guide, MDA
	This Minnesota Department of Agriculture website provides an overview of financial and technical assistance for nutrient management.
 Conservation Funding Guide: Practice & Payment Information, MDA
	On this Minnesota Department of Agriculture website, you can select a conservation practice and compare payments.
COST ANALYSIS PLANNING TOOLS
	Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool
	
 Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool - Nitrogen BMP Spreadsheet (Lazarus et al., 2013)
	The Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool (Excel Spreadsheet) was developed as part of the Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters Study by researchers at the University of MInnesota and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The project purpose was to develop a framework for a watershed nitrogen planning aid that could be used to compare and optimize selection of "Best Management Practices" (BMPs) for reducing the nitrogen load from the highest contributing sources and pathways in the watershed.
	
	
 Overview of Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool
	
 NBMP Tool - Maps
	
 NBMP Spreadsheet (Excel) 
 
	
	Cost Analysis of Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy
	An analysis of costs is provided in Chapter 5.5 of the Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy for both wastewater nutrient removal and agricultural BMP implementation.
	Excerpts from 
 Chapter 5: Point and Nonpoint Source Reductions
	
 Appendix C: Program Recommendations
	
	Wastewater
	
	Source: Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy, Chapter 5: Point and Nonpoint Source Reductions, 2013
	
	Agricultural BMPs
	
	Source: Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy, Chapter 5: Point and Nonpoint Source Reductions, 2013